Climate Action Platform Africa
What the fertiliser shock means for Africa · CAP-A

In late May, CAP-A argued in African Business that the war in the Middle East was choking the world’s fertiliser supply — and that Africa, which imports most of the fertiliser it uses, risked being priced out of the market altogether. This is where that shortfall now stands.

Read CAP-A’s op-ed — “As fertiliser shortage bites, Africa must look to its own soil,” African Business, 27 May 2026 →

Prices have recovered.
Africa’s access hasn’t.

Africa imports nearly all its fertiliser, so when the world makes less, it is the price-taking buyer that goes short first. Iran and Qatar, the plants at the heart of the shock, remain offline on a multi-year rebuild — and the urea they never made is gone for good.

The shortfall, in African termsthe same lost tonnes, set against what Sub-Saharan Africa needs
9 months
of Sub-Saharan Africa’s annual nitrogen use, expressed as urea-equivalent
=
4.0–4.9 Mt
of urea never produced since the outage began
=
7%
of all the urea the world would normally have made in that time
What’s gone — and what each further year costs
Even the loss so far is on the scale of Africa’s whole year
million tonnes of urea, against Sub-Saharan Africa’s entire annual nitrogen use, with both figures expressed as urea-equivalent
051015Mt4.413.3One year of Sub-Saharan Africa’s nitrogen use,expressed as urea-equivalent (5.9 Mt)≈ 2× Africa, every yearLost so far(over ≈4 months; all causes)If Iran and Qatar stay offline(each further year it continues)
So why has the price recovered? Urea has fallen about 30–36% from its April peak, back near pre-war levels, as the wartime panic premium drained out of the market. But a price reflects sentiment, not supply: the tonnes charted above are still missing, and a calmer market has not refilled a single silo.
How the situation has changed
The picture eased — but not where it counts
urea capacity affected, million tonnes a year — offline, production cuts and at-risk: first analysis vs now
Capacity offlineProduction cutsCapacity at risk — still producing, not a loss
15.99.810.235.9 MtFirst analysis13.93.012.829.7 MtCurrent positionAffected capacity is down ~6 Mt — almost all of it the production-cuts band easing back.The Iran–Qatar core (~13 Mt/yr) hasn’t moved — that loss is locked in.
What about Europe? Europe’s plants largely kept producing through 2026 — its gas squeeze was far milder than in 2022 — so little urea was actually lost, and it sits outside the figures above. The exposure is real but latent: up to ~17 Mt of gas-dependent capacity (≈3× Sub-Saharan Africa’s annual nitrogen use, expressed as urea-equivalent) could curtail in a severe, 2022-scale spike. A risk to watch, not a loss to count.
Bottom line

The price has recovered; the lost fertiliser has not. India’s plants are back and Saudi cargoes are moving again — but Iran and Qatar, the heart of the shock, remain offline on a multi-year rebuild. The world has already lost 4.0–4.9 Mt of urea, about nine months of Sub-Saharan Africa’s nitrogen use on a like-for-like urea-equivalent basis, and every further year those plants stay down costs another 12–15 Mt. For Africa — importing nearly all its fertiliser and unable to outbid wealthier buyers — a falling price is relief, not repair.

Source: CAP-A internal analysis. Cumulative production losses calculated to 29 June 2026; supply constraints last checked 13 July 2026. Figures are tonnes of urea product or the urea-equivalent of nitrogen demand; ranges show low–high estimates. Sub-Saharan African nitrogen demand is shown for scale and expressed as urea-equivalent.Offline capacity is shown at 100% utilisation (rated nameplate). The forward figure (13.3 Mt) covers Iran and Qatar; the further 0.6 Mt in the offline band (13.9 Mt) is Bahrain’s GPIC, which we understand is back online or imminently so.
Climate Action Platform Africa